Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Search Representations

Results for Harron Homes Ltd. search

New search New search

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Housing Provision

Representation ID: 6707

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes notes that the SHMA needs to be updated to take into account the 2014 based population figures and household projections as well as other factors (unmet need etc) and questions the housing requirement of 300 dwellings per annum.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Table 4.1: Settlement Hierarchy

Representation ID: 6713

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes broadly supports the proposed settlement hierarchy which identifies the settlements of Morton and North Wingfield as Level 2 settlements.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS2: Scale of Development

Representation ID: 6715

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes suggests that the scale of development will have to be increased above the current proposal of 6,600 dwellings for the plan period.

Full text:

See attachment

Support

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS3 : Spatial Strategy and the Distribution of Development

Representation ID: 6718

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes broadly supports the proposed housing target and points out that if the target be amended they would review their position regarding the housing requirements for the district.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Table 4.2: Housing Provision by Level 1 and Level 2 Settlement

Representation ID: 6725

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes objects to the housing provision set out in table 4.2, in particular to the level of distribution for Morton and North Wingfield which are at the lower end of scale compared to other Level 2 settlements. It is argued that the Council's evidence base would demonstrate that both settlements could support a higher level of growth. According to the Council's Settlement Hierarchy Study North Wingfield would achieve the highest score and Morton would achieve the same score than Shirland. Also, Harron Homes criticises the Council's approach for the proposed housing provision.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Table 4.2: Housing Provision by Level 1 and Level 2 Settlement

Representation ID: 6734

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes also objects to the proposed housing provision for Renishaw because the Council would have to show that there are exceptional circumstances for release from the Green Belt but this was not provided. The Green Belt review would conclude that for Renishaw more houses are provided than the housing requirement identified in several growth scenarios. Also, the Schedule of Potential Housing Sites identified less homes. In short, the proposed housing provision for Renishaw would be too high and there would be alternative options with the non-Green Belt sites proposed by Harron Homes in North Wingfield and Morton.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS3 : Spatial Strategy and the Distribution of Development

Representation ID: 6736

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes comments on this policy that the Council has not identified the exceptional circumstances necessary to justify the release of Green Belt land adjoining Renishaw.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS4: The Avenue

Representation ID: 6738

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes mentions that the Avenue site in Wingerworth was allocated in the previous Local Plan but did not come forward. The site is subject to a remediation programme which has been delayed and is in multiple ownership. It is maintained the delivery of 710 dwellings from this site is overly optimistic and a lower quantum of dwellings should be identified and alternative sites allocated to ensure the plan is deliverable, in particular their won sites in Morton and North Wingfield.

Full text:

See attachment

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

ai. Land to the North East of Hague Lane, Renishaw

Representation ID: 6749

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes objects to the proposed housing allocation of site ai. Due to the fact that it is situated within the Green Belt the Council has not identified the exceptional circumstances necessary to justify the release of the site and has not demonstrated that it has fully examined all other reasonable options. The respondent questions why Renishaw has the second highest amount of proposed distribution of all the Level 2 settlements and proposes to redistribute the dwellings proposed at Renishaw to other non-Green Belt sites/settlements within Level 2 like Morton and North Wingfield.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy LC1: Housing Allocations

Representation ID: 6750

Received: 07/04/2017

Respondent: Harron Homes Ltd.

Agent: ID Planning

Representation Summary:

Harron Homes wishes to allocate Land at Street Road (LAA site MOR/2203) and Land off Little Morton Road (NW/701). With regards to the former site the respondent argues that the extent of land which has been assessed by the Council does not reflect the site area which was submitted to the Council through the call for sites. Regarding LAA site NW/701 the Council would have to justify why the site has not being allocated given the scores achieved. Eventually, the respondent questions the deliverability of housing allocations site 'ad' and 'ag' in North Wingfield.

Full text:

See attachment

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.