Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Search Representations

Results for Green Piling Ltd search

New search New search

Support

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

D6 Green Belt

Representation ID: 5965

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling strongly supports Objective D6 (Green Belt). The redevelopment of the Land south of Smithybrook Road would meet with this objective as it offers the opportunity to minimise Green Belt losses.

Support

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

E2 Land Remediation

Representation ID: 5966

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling also strongly supports Objective E2 (Land Remediation). This will facilitate the redevelopment of underused sites such as our own one.

Support

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS1: Sustainable Development

Representation ID: 5967

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

The respondent generally supports the policy's principles and particularly supports part B which promotes the efficient use of land and re-use of previously developed land in sustainable locations.

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS3 : Spatial Strategy and the Distribution of Development

Representation ID: 5968

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling supports the Settlement Hierarchy, albeit they consider that Renishaw's housing provision should be higher and that the site at Smithybrook Road could be utilised to minimise Green Belt losses.

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS2: Scale of Development

Representation ID: 5970

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling generally supports the proposed level of new employment land of 50ha. However, the respondent has serious concerns about the way in which the Council calculated their housing need which includes 1,016 houses which have already been built/delivered. This would directly contravene paragraph 47 of the NPPF, as these houses are delivered, as opposed to deliverable.

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy SS9: North East Derbyshire Green Belt

Representation ID: 5972

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling supports the Council's protection of Green Belt. However, the respondent strongly objects against the assertion that the planned housing growth in NED cannot be accommodated sustainably within sites which are spatially distributed in accordance with settlement hierarchy. It is considered that suitable Brownfield sites exist elsewhere within the district which are being unnecessarily protected for employment use.

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Employment Land Provision

Representation ID: 5973

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling suggests that once the most up-to-date Employment Land Update (ELU) is issued later this year the policy of employment land provision (50ha) should be revisited. There is clearly the opportunity to release this site from the allocation without having a detrimental impact on high quality employment land supply within the district. Such an approach would be consistent with the proposed spatial strategy.

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Policy WC2: Primary Employment Areas

Representation ID: 5974

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling considers that the extent of the designated Ravenshorn Commercial Park employment site should be reduced, in order to allow the release of their own site.

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

ai. Land to the North East of Hague Lane, Renishaw

Representation ID: 5977

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Green Piling strongly objects to the allocation of site ai (Land to the North East of Hague Lane) because their own site would be available instead within the short or medium term and is already served by an established highway network. Allocation of their site for residential use would also result in the ability to reduce Green Belt loss.

Comment

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Distribution of Growth & the Settlement Hierarchy

Representation ID: 5980

Received: 10/04/2017

Respondent: Green Piling Ltd

Agent: Knight Frank

Representation Summary:

Sustainability: Green Piling argues that their site occupies a highly sustainable location within the defined settlement boundary of Renishaw. The release of their land, particularly if in addition to the adjacent vacant land to the east (Panache Lingerie site) would also enable an adequate standard of amenity to be achieved for future occupants.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.