NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

Search representations

Results for National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc search

New search New search

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45219 – Land off Freydon Way, Calow

Representation ID: 14740

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45262 – Land to the West of Feld Lane, Holmewood

Representation ID: 14741

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45236 – Land North of Williamthorpe Road and East of Chesterfield Road, North Wingfield, Derbyshire

Representation ID: 14742

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45092 – Tregarthyan House Green Lane and land adjacent to Mulberry Walk, Lower Pilsley

Representation ID: 14743

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45542 – Land at Lower Pilsley

Representation ID: 14744

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45884 – Land East of Rupert Street and South of Green Lane, Lower Pilsley

Representation ID: 14745

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45593 – Land at Stonebroom, Alfreton

Representation ID: 14746

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45105 – Land off Stretton Road, Morton, Derbyshire

Representation ID: 14747

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

Comment

NEDDC Local Plan Issues and Options Consultation on the Strategic Approach to the Location of Development and Refined Sites (March 2026)

45912 – Fields South of Maltby Avenue and Oak View Gardens

Representation ID: 14748

Received: 30/04/2026

Respondent: National Grid Electricity Distribution Plc

Agent: Lucy White Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Where diversion or undergrounding of overhead lines is required to enable development, lower voltage lines (up to 33kV) can normally be diverted or undergrounded without significant concern. However, where sites are affected by higher voltage lines, particularly 132kV supported by steel lattice towers, the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is advised to engage with NGED early to confirm whether lines can remain in situ or whether diversion or undergrounding is viable and feasible.
The respondent states LPAs should consider costs, need for additional infrastructure, visual impacts such as terminal towers, and potential impacts on delivery timescales. They state undergrounded lines require a 10m corridor and restrict development above them, whereas retaining overhead lines allows uses such as green infrastructure, highways and drainage.
The respondent states NGED cannot be held accountable where no agreed solution is in place prior to Local Plan adoption.
They state reinforcement planning is essential, with LPAs required to work with NGED to identify sites for substations and ensure delivery timescales align with housing trajectories. They state LPAs should engage in the Distributed Future Energy Scenarios process.
The respondent does not object to allocations but states infrastructure should be retained where possible and early engagement with NGED is required.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.