WW/1609

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Comment

Schedule of Sites Consultation Document (February 2015)

Representation ID: 1481

Received: 08/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Byard

Representation:

Totally un-necessary with the other approved developments on brownfield or infill sites. An attractive green field site in a prominent position. Traffic to the site via Deerlands Road would be excessive and intrusive. New development should be concentrated adjacent A61 where developers contributions can be used to improve traffic flows

Full text:

Totally un-necessary with the other approved developments on brownfield or infill sites. An attractive green field site in a prominent position. Traffic to the site via Deerlands Road would be excessive and intrusive. New development should be concentrated adjacent A61 where developers contributions can be used to improve traffic flows

Comment

Schedule of Sites Consultation Document (February 2015)

Representation ID: 1546

Received: 20/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Kenneth Hardwick

Representation:

This site should be rejected as an option;
1. Far larger than required to meet the inflated demand for 248 houses.
2. Is a site of great natural beauty and given the scale shown would extend almost to Tupton apart from a very narrow ribbon of land.
3. Not at all well connected to the village and the infrastructure to support it. Other sites in the east of the village have the potential to be much better connected.
4. The current development of 51 homes on the small bottom section has already had a massive negative impact on the surrounding area.

Full text:

This site should be rejected as an option;
1. Far larger than required to meet the inflated demand for 248 houses.
2. Is a site of great natural beauty and given the scale shown would extend almost to Tupton apart from a very narrow ribbon of land.
3. Not at all well connected to the village and the infrastructure to support it. Other sites in the east of the village have the potential to be much better connected.
4. The current development of 51 homes on the small bottom section has already had a massive negative impact on the surrounding area.

Comment

Schedule of Sites Consultation Document (February 2015)

Representation ID: 2312

Received: 30/03/2015

Respondent: Rippon Homes

Agent: RPS (Birmingham office)

Representation:

Object to Sustainability Appraisal of Site WW/1605. It doesn't assess reduced 9.5ha area (2014 call for sites), but entire 19ha landholding.

SA scored 19ha landholding poorly. 9.5ha site is Flood Zone 1 which is not a constraint, and has capacity for 250 dwellings, including market and affordable.

Disagree with assessment of landscape/biodiversity impacts. Site is well screened and contained between new housing to south and woodland to north/east.

9.5ha site is suitable for development, is similar character to appeal site, can be developed without harm to character of Wingerworth or surrounding landscape. Could deliver 250 dwellings within 5 years.

Full text:

See attached

Comment

Schedule of Sites Consultation Document (February 2015)

Representation ID: 2361

Received: 26/03/2015

Respondent: Historic England

Representation:

Site WW/1609 could also affect the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Schedule of Sites Consultation Document (February 2015)

Representation ID: 2525

Received: 26/03/2015

Respondent: Campaign to Protect Rural England

Representation:

Site considered generally detrimental to the rural identity of the settlement or its countryside surroundings.

Full text:

See attached