Question 19

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Examination Consultation Provision for Gypsies and Travellers

Representation ID: 9189

Received: 10/01/2019

Respondent: Mr John Kirby

Representation:

Why are extra spaces necessary when NE Derbyshire already has sites.

Will council-tax payers money be used to fund the site.

Have all planning regulations been followed in this application.

Full text:

Why are extra spaces necessary when NE Derbyshire already has sites.

Will council-tax payers money be used to fund the site.

Have all planning regulations been followed in this application.

Support

Examination Consultation Provision for Gypsies and Travellers

Representation ID: 9195

Received: 11/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Skye Hayes

Representation:

New plains for travellers etc should have mini homes built for thoses like to visit

Full text:

New plains for travellers etc should have mini homes built for thoses like to visit ...redacted...

Object

Examination Consultation Provision for Gypsies and Travellers

Representation ID: 9383

Received: 23/01/2019

Respondent: North Wingfield Parish Council

Representation:

North Wingfield Parish Council would like to object to the site on Dark Lane, North Wingfield, being included in the local plan as an established Gypsy and Traveller site.
We believe that, whilst acknowledging that travellers are already on the site, they are there without the relevant planning permission.
The community believes that it is counter intuitive to put this site into the local plan just because it is already there. This appears to turn the planning system on its head.
Whilst we are opposing this site for the reasons mentioned, if the inspector deems this site suitable, the Parish Council and local residents would like a guarantee that this site will not grow and there will be a limit of 3 plots that are designated in this proposal.

Full text:

North Wingfield Parish Council would like to object to the site on Dark Lane, North Wingfield, being included in the local plan as an established Gypsy and Traveller site.
We believe that, whilst acknowledging that travellers are already on the site, they are there without the relevant planning permission.
The community believes that it is counter intuitive to put this site into the local plan just because it is already there. This appears to turn the planning system on its head.
Whilst we are opposing this site for the reasons mentioned, if the inspector deems this site suitable, the Parish Council and local residents would like a guarantee that this site will not grow and there will be a limit of 3 plots that are designated in this proposal.

Object

Examination Consultation Provision for Gypsies and Travellers

Representation ID: 9606

Received: 29/01/2019

Respondent: Mr John Lander

Representation:

It's been brought to my attention that towards the end of Dark Lane North Wingfield the pot holes have been recently being repaired and the ditches cleaned out an the road looking a lot
tidier than it's been for a long time. I've observed a NEDDC /Bolsover Council road sweeper this afternoon cleaning around the vicinity, not seen this before, all seems
like a good impression make over situation.
Is some one making it look good for the Inspector visit to make it traveller/gypsy pitches appealing for approval to go ahead for acceptance for more traveller /gypsy.
I've heard the traveller/gypsy place at Wingerworth has been rejected , and I'll bet that Wooley Moor near Ashover will be strongly opposed too and rejected.

Full text:

It's been brought to my attention that towards the end of Dark Lane North Wingfield the pot holes have been recently being repaired and the ditches cleaned out an the road looking a lot
tidier than it's been for a long time. I've observed a NEDDC /Bolsover Council road sweeper this afternoon cleaning around the vicinity, not seen this before, all seems
like a good impression make over situation.
Is some one making it look good for the Inspector visit to make it traveller/gypsy pitches appealing for approval to go ahead for acceptance for more traveller /gypsy.
I've heard the traveller/gypsy place at Wingerworth has been rejected , and I'll bet that Wooley Moor near Ashover will be strongly opposed too and rejected.
My theory is North Wingfield will accept them via the back door...nudge nudge wink wink,
I do not want any more up there.