Figure 4.9: Key Diagram

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Consultation Draft (February 2017)

Representation ID: 4676

Received: 12/03/2017

Respondent: Mr Michael Daley

Representation Summary:

Given the unknown impact of the recently started Peak Resort leisure development as well as existing congestion within the main arteries of Dronfield I do not believe that the town's infrastructure can cope with an additional 800 plus houses so I am opposed to the proposed changes to the Green Belt around the town.
I also believe that existing undeveloped sites within Unstone (e.g. the garden centre and adjacent boat sales yard) and Dronfield (e.g. the Hearty Oak pub site which has been unused for the last few years) demonstrate a lack of demand for housing on such a scale

Full text:

Given the unknown impact of the recently started Peak Resort leisure development as well as existing congestion within the main arteries of Dronfield I do not believe that the town's infrastructure can cope with an additional 800 plus houses so I am opposed to the proposed changes to the Green Belt around the town.
I also believe that existing undeveloped sites within Unstone (e.g. the garden centre and adjacent boat sales yard) and Dronfield (e.g. the Hearty Oak pub site which has been unused for the last few years) demonstrate a lack of demand for housing on such a scale